

The customer's challenge
The customer's challenge
The company suffered from having grown by acquisition without having incurred the cost of transferring all acquired companies into proper systems for transparency and administrative efficiency. As a result, it had reached a limit on its acquisitions as it needed more control over the finances of all operations. When it was decided to make an investment, the company had about 6000 employees.
System before/after
System before/after
The company was a group with several different systems, about half of which were home-built. Among other things, they left an old version of Agresso behind when they decided to replace everything with a combination of the ERP system 4PS, Symbrio (purchasing) and Handyman (assignment reporting and self-monitoring on the mobile phone).
Solution
Solution
In order to share the large investment, it was decided that all subsidiaries in the Nordic region would have a common system solution, which also became the scope of the project. We who were responsible for managing the programme contributed with our knowledge of the civil engineering industry combined with our long experience in project management and project economics to staff and drive the project forward with great vigour. In particular, our integrated change management helped a lot along the way.
Result
Result
With a couple of minor time delays due to the complexity of the change and the fact that all 6000 employees were affected, we reached the goal with very good results. The fact that the customer expanded the scope of the project along the way meant that the value for the organisation was raised even more than originally intended. The return on investment was realised in a short time as the efficiency of the project administration was significantly increased.
Conclusions
Conclusions
If the implementing company sees that greater value can be realised by adding minor refinements to the solution during the project at a limited cost in terms of a slightly extended project time, it can create a much better investment. However, some senior executives had extensive experience of system changes so the decision to extend the scope was well founded and not taken lightly.