

The customer's challenge
The customer's challenge
The customer's different countries had reached different levels of maturity in using the system support or tools previously chosen to support the current process for handling deviations and cases. The challenge was therefore to find a system support that suited the countries' different starting points and needs.
There were also some challenges during the system procurement for the organisation's representatives to look at the procurement from a holistic and objective perspective, "what would suit our organisation best", not "what would suit me best". Since, for example, Avvik and TOPdesk were already implemented in both Sweden and Norway, there were certain tendencies to want to lift those systems to avoid having to change, which is a completely normal reaction.
Systems before and after
Systems before and after
In Sweden, TOPdesk had been introduced in some departments, such as Logistics/Transport, and a process for handling deviations had been implemented in the Swedish organisation.
In Norway, Avvik.com was implemented as a system support to support the management of deviations.
In Finland, the organisation was less advanced and the process was managed in Excel.
Freshservice (Freshworks) was the system support that was ultimately chosen by the organisations involved in the project. The system has a modern interface, built on a platform that is configurable, low-code and thus a good choice for the customer who wants to define their own processes and implement them in the system support.
Solution
Solution
During a number of proof of concept demos together with a total of 7 different system suppliers (TOPdesk, Freshservice, Puzzel, Avvik, Easitgo, Phronesys and SuperOffice), we ended up with 3 suppliers that matched the requirements best. Which was TOPdesk, Freshservice and Puzzel.
After a second round of demos with our shortlist, it finally came down to TOPdesk and Freshservice, with the organisation voting for Freshservice as the system they wanted to implement to support the new deviation management process in all countries.
Result
Result
To ensure that the system support met both the requirements for functionality and the developed process, we chose to break it down into certain critical evaluation criteria where we scored each system supplier.
One of the objectives of the project was to get a decision on a system support, which we got. We ended up with a group decision to implement Freshservice. The system support that was chosen also had the capacity to handle other processes such as customer service and CRM in the same interface. This attracted the customer to have all their processes in one interface, but in different modules.

Conclusions
Conclusions
We as independent management consultants never make the actual choice of system support, but the choice was entirely up to the organisation. Based on the analysis and packaging of our findings, the business could make its choice of new system support. We consultants who worked during the project were commissioned to also carry out the implementation.