Operationalising project management in a Nordic construction company to support all project managers through a process-oriented approach.

The customer's challenge

The customer's challenge

Their existing operational/management system, which is currently hosted on SharePoint, is characterised by thousands of documents containing long procedures, policies, large amounts of text and outdated information for those running the projects. This results in the business system not being used to the extent that it was intended and it has grown and become too complex for the user.

Systems before and after

Systems before and after

As mentioned in the previous paragraph, the customer currently sits in a SharePoint environment and tries to support its project managers with document templates, routines and descriptions. In addition to the business system, the customer currently has a few different systems and to name a few they have MAP for costing, Primona for purchasing management/planning, Dalux for on-site management with diaries and meeting minutes, Agresso like an ERP and Dynamics for CRM.

What we were looking for together with the customer was to bake together the entire business system they have today in a simplified interface for the end user. The goal was to create a project management hub for all project managers where they can follow up their projects on a daily basis, the status of risks/opportunities, added tasks, budget/outcome and any experience feedback.

Solution

Solution

In order to keep up with the competitors' ability to deliver projects with better results, our client needed to implement a standardised way of running their projects in the different phases. The image below is the scope that we believe a new project management system should support.

Result

Result

The ultimate goal of a new project management system can be broken down into the following overall objectives

  • Being able to define, configure and implement own processes in the system support.
  • To support project managers in all phases of the project with project management.
  • Role-based views that allow all project participants to see what is relevant to their specific role.
  • The system should not be document-driven, but should instead be characterised by quick guides, checklists and - if desired - the ability to look at supporting documentation.

Conclusions

Conclusions

Today, the customer's competitors are conducting similar projects to better ensure project delivery by increasing the possibility of more effective control of project activities and overall management from a process-oriented approach.

The system support that we have evaluated during the system procurement has been Workpoint, CaneaOne, Procore, BlueAnt, Autodesk Construction Cloud, and Connex. Together with the project team, we have landed on the basis of the needs that have emerged during the project on a new system support does not match the standard systems available today on the market. We at Rededge have also reached this conclusion with other customers who have instead chosen to develop their own project management system, which requires a greater effort from everyone involved.

We carry out at least 20 different assignments in parallel, which means that our experience bank is developing at a rapid pace. To give you inspiration for projects that can be similar to your current challenges, we share here what we have learnt from others that will benefit you in a future assignment.

What we have done